Christina Sheila JORDAN
Christina Sheila JORDAN
Royaume-Uni

9ème législature Christina Sheila JORDAN

Groupes politiques

  • 02-07-2019 / 31-01-2020 : Non-inscrits

Partis nationaux

  • 02-07-2019 / 31-01-2020 : The Brexit Party (Royaume-Uni)

Membre

  • 02-07-2019 / 31-01-2020 : Commission de l'environnement, de la santé publique et de la sécurité alimentaire
  • 02-07-2019 / 31-01-2020 : Délégation pour les relations avec l'Inde

Autres activités parlementaires

Explications de vote écrites

Les députés peuvent expliquer par écrit leur vote en plénière. Article 194 du règlement intérieur.

Demande d'application de la procédure d'urgence: Périodes d'application des règlements (UE) 2019/501 et (UE) 2019/50 ( - Karima Delli) EN

10-10-2019

. ‒ The Brexit party voted in favour of this urgency procedure. The report seeks to ensure that air and road travel is not disrupted in case of no deal Brexit, updating the date of implementation to take into account the seven months extension. The Brexit party voted in favour as we support bringing forward this report in order to prepare for Brexit.

Accord sur la coopération entre Eurojust et la Serbie (A9-0009/2019 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar) EN

10-10-2019

The Brexit Party have voted to abstain on this report. Whilst data exchanges and cooperation, particularly for the purpose of combatting serious crime, are very important we do not support this being facilitated at EU level. However, if the sovereign nation of Serbia wishes to participate it would not be appropriate to block their decision. Therefore, as we support the underlying principle of cooperation and data sharing to combat serious crime, but not the EU facilitating it, we felt that abstaining was most suitable.

Modification des fonds mobilisés au titre de l'instrument de flexibilité en 2019 pour des questions liées à la migration, à l'afflux de réfugiés et aux menaces pesant sur la sécurité (A9-0013/2019 - John Howarth) EN

10-10-2019

The Brexit Party voted in favour of this budgetary proposal. The original Commission proposal was to reduce a payment plan for future EU spending in the field of migration and security. This proposal was linked to the Draft Amending Budget Number 4, which should have led to a reduction in Member States’ contributions; however, a Labour MEP managed to make amendments to reverse this. In this case, however, the proposition was to support the original proposal to cut EU funding, not the amendments by the rapporteur, so we voted in favour.

Déclarations

Toutes les déclarations ci-après ont été signées par le député, même si la signature n’est pas visible dans la version en ligne.